We can learn a lot from super heroes. 

There's this quintessential statement that has been cemented in the lore surrounding Spider-Man.
"With great power comes great responsibility"
We've all heard it.  Or, most of us anyway.  And it's the thing that makes a super hero just that.

People will squabble all day long about what makes a super hero.  Or maybe even just a hero in general.  Is it their powers?  If so, perhaps Batman doesn't qualify.  After all, he's just a rich guy.  And here departs the sarcasm train, inevitably leading to Tony Stark's money, and somehow looping back around to Superman and whether he's cool or just ridiculously overpowered.

And somehow in all of this semantical nonsense, we've missed the point.
Let me reiterate: "With great power comes great responsibility."

Specifically as people who can create, whether we be artists, musicians, filmmakers, anything, we have power.  Great power.  The power to change and shape minds and culture.  To inspire, or merely redirect.  We have the power to give people something to identify with.  To stand behind or rally around.

Because behind every great song, every film, every heroic campaign, there's something basic.  Something elemental that resonates within ourselves and others that reminds us of who we're meant to be.

It's why when Bruce Wayne garnishes himself with a bat, years later street kids are scribbling it on the sidewalk in hopes that he'll return.  It's why, after the Avengers save New York, children are strapping trash can lids painted with stars to to their arms and guys head to the barber shops in droves to get the unmistakable Stark goatee.  It's why, when Peter Parker prints a spider on a luge onesie and finds who he is, street artists scrawl arachnids on brick walls in dripping paint.  It's why one kid who knew there's more  purpose to music and adventure and all things media than just entertainment sketched out a fireball on a scrap of paper, then invited others to wear it proudly.

"What is this, Sam?" You may ask.  "Narcissism?"  No.  This is a reality check.

Look, thanks to Suzanne Collins, hordes of females are running around with a fictional bird stuck to them and wearing their braids slung over one shoulder (not that I have a problem with Suzanne Collins.  I quite like "The Hunger Games").

I consider myself a lot of things.  A writer, an actor, but let me speak chiefly as a musician for a moment.

As musicians, we are one of the few types of people on earth that are basically looked at like super heroes.  I'm not saying we "deserve" it any more than the single father construction workers.  But it's just the way it is.

I remember when I was a kid.  Real little.  Like, 3rd and 4th grade.  I remember hearing lyrics out of other kid's mouths.  Seeing them imitate dances they saw on TV.  And even then I remember thinking, "These kids need different a different kind musician."  I won't say "a better class" (despite the Dark Knight reference here that's just begging to be corrected), because I'm not going to arbitrarily throw blame around.  But different.

The Grammys.  The resonance is still palpable, and I didn't even watch the thing (not because I have some big objection to the Grammys, I was just doing something else that night).  But people talk.  And the internet, well, it's the internet. 

Is it risque or is it empowering?  Is it edgy or is it damaging?  Is it inspiring or just sad?

We are culture shapers.  People will google us and see what we stand for, what we believe in, how we live, what our lyrics mean.  They'll wear our emblems, our hairstyles, our shutter-shades.  Men.  Women.  Children.

One thing about super-heroes, they have remarkable power.  Superman got his via a somewhat involuntary manifestation, but hey, so did Darkseid.  Imagine the self-control it must take to be Superman.  Batman is a guy with wealth, brains and astounding skills.  But hey, so is Deathstroke.  Peter Parker is the result of what you might call an accident.  But so is pretty much everyone he fights.  It comes down to what you choose do do with your power.

We creators, we have remarkable power.  In the wake of a performance or a major release, people often treat us like our abilities are nearly mythical.  And you know what?  Perhaps they are.  We can stick our hands right into your soul, and so often, you are more than willing to let us. 

But we must remember the lesson that Peter Parker's story has endeavored to hammer into our collective awareness.  Because people will imitate us.  They WILL follow us.  They will lend their themselves to our causes, but we have the responsibility of being the vanguards of those causes.

We may not always do it perfectly.  It's sad to see life overcome some little Disney star and watch their life suffer as they try to define who they are.  We too, after all, still undergo constant character development. But like any good super hero, our endeavor should be to embody the ideal.  This power isn't just for us. 

Because so often we already have the super, but we also have to remember the hero.

Recently, I posted this to social media, "Not fishing for compliments, but thankS to any1 who encouraged me in singing. My voice was a source of self-conciousness for a LONG time."

Much to my chagrin, Twitter's 140 character limit forced me to use webspeak to articulate this post (and we just won't talk about my outright capitalization faux pas).  However, you get the point.

It may come as a surprise to you to hear this from a performer, but it was true.  Before I made The Spark, I tried time and again to come to terms with the way I sounded behind a microphone.  Take for take, there was always something.  Weird enunciation.  Glottal noises.  The vocal fry didn't want to fry that day.  It sounded too too immature.  Too something.  I knew how I wanted to sound, and it wasn't what I was hearing.  Mostly, it was just the timbre of my own voice and the tinges of colloquial accents that I just wanted to be different.  Because I KNEW what a really good singer sounded like. 

And then there's the voices in your head that come with being a music student.  Knowing so many spectacular vocal majors and theater students that could probably tear apart my breath support.  My diction, vibrato, head and chest tones.  And at the end of the day, even if I had gotten ALL of that right, I still didn't even know if I liked what I heard.

I was comfortable in the realm of the instrumental.  That's what I had buried myself in for years.  I picked up the piano, the saxophone, the guitar, bass, and drums.  Composing, arranging, mixing.  Assuming through all that time that singing would just be easy.  Because everybody sings.  It was just that the further I went, the more I knew what I wanted to sound like,  I wanted to just be more than a "great songwriter and an ok singer", and felt so desperately hindered by what I heard on playback, despite 25 takes full of good intentions and full-bore energy.

And even in the spheres of instrumentals and post-production, I could feel the constant mental barrage of "what-if" criticisms.  Because again, being a music major or even just a professional, there was always going to be someone who could legitimately tear apart saxophone tone or pitch.  Someone who might know what I could have done better with guitar sounds or articulation, or who could call me out for using parallel intervals in my part-writing for strings. 

But the voice.  The voice remained my biggest stumbling block.  And it wasn't that I never sang publicly, my vocals drenched in the maw of loud instruments and messy live sound.  It wasn't that I didn't have those moments singing in the car when I thought,"MAN!  If only I were doing a vocal take right now instead of singing to the dashboard!  I'm ON IT right now!".  But still, getting behind that ever-demanding microscope of a studio condenser just seemed to always leave me frustrated.  Should I have taken more voice lessons when I was younger?  Should I have taken them in college?  Should I just keep waiting for my voice to change some more?  I didn't just want to sound like another high-note yelling guy.

As always, I'm going somewhere with this.

Now, back when I started recording, I did not have the "proper" equipment to be doing it.  I was literally recoding full-on songs with a computer mic.  A Packard-Bell, "oh look, you can use this in an AOL chatroom" computer mic.  With it, I would mic a Roland keyboard amp (though which, I became mad-skilled at playing keyboard drums for a 12 or 13 year old, or whatever I was) that belonged to the church or an Esteban lunchbox practice amp and record into Sony's "Acid" music studio, which was quite literally $60 at Best Buy.  Recorded right onto our dell lookalike.  I eventually graduated to recording guitars direct from a pedal and using an interface, but i was still using that clunky old program.  And to give you an idea of just how clunky it was, EVERY take created a brand new track.  And was stuck that way.  And if you were using plugins like reverb, delay, distortion, etc., you had to MANUALLY copy those settings for literally every take you did.  Even just volume and pan.  EVERYTHING.  Needless to say, I I ended up with projects with well over 100 tracks in them.  And even back then, I couldn't just record songs with bare bones rock bands.  I was working those keyboard string and synth sounds for everything they were worth.  But I did the best with what I had.

In high school, I got ahold of Mackie's Tracktion.  I could finally record multiple takes on the same track.  Listen, I know that's not a big deal, but it was huge to me.  Mixing wasn't so much expertise to me as it was making each element sound "cool" and hoping it all worked together.  And I was still mixing on hyped computer speakers from Best Buy (but hey, they had a cool sub).  Which, to be fair, was a step up from the dinky plastic "welcome to Windows 98" ones I started with. 

It was during those days (or perhaps more often, nights) that I wrote so much music.  Night after night in the basement, out of the sunlight and a few degrees colder than I liked it.  With no one but the immediate family and the occasional friend really listening.  For years.  YEARS.  Grabbing the guitar and playing concerts for future audiences in an empty room.  I could see them.  I could see the stadiums.  Sometimes it was exciting, but other times, so frustrating.

It was during those days in high school that I made Premonitions.  Writing and recording were one in the same thing.  No physical person around me knew how to teach me to do what I was doing, to give authoritative answers to questions technical or musical.  My family supported me, bought me things (for which I am very thankful), but if I wanted to learn something, into the internet hole I went.  Into the abyss of forums, not knowing the term for what I was trying to do, and wrangling through search queries until I finally figured out what "it" was called.  And you know what?  Even now, as a 22 year old who holds a music degree, I am still enthralled by the music that came out of those times.  There's stuff I wrote when I was 14 that I still plan on using.  Because I was doing the best with what I had, and it was still good.

In college I made the transition to Logic, and finally met someone who could teach me things about something I sort of thought I knew.  Damon Sink took me under his wing in the areas of studio mixing and composition. 

It wasn't always ideal though.  We were both horribly busy in the music department and were doing this stuff as an independent study of sorts.  We often met in his office and just hooked my laptop up to a couple of mini monitors to talk about mixes I was working on for other bands.  Sometimes though, we'd meet at his home studio, which was much more conducive to sonic learning.  But hey, did I mention that by this time I was doing work for other bands?  Which was sort of astounding, given that I knew so little technically, but thankfully have been blessed with a good ear.

Through all this time I had experimented with vocals.  Never happy with them.  Yet, by some miracle, I was mixing the vocals of other people, and that stuff seemed to work.  So what was the deal?!  So I decided to put my foot in the door by doing guest vocal spots on other people's albums.  it was a way to see what people's reactions would be.  And if listeners didn't like it, then hey, I was just a guest vocal. 

That was the first step.  That was first time I forced myself to do it.  But there was a sort of merit in that.

Eventually I told myself something.  I told myself  that all my personal excuses (all based in self-criticism) couldn't continue to stop me.  I told myself that if I didn't make myself do it, it wouldn't get done.  That I had to give it what I had, even if I wasn't totally satisfied with it. 

It was hard, because with every take, with every edit, I felt the weight of history.  I know that sounds really overdramatic, but in my head it was like, this could be the take that ends up on the recording FOREVER.  And that was such a huge deal to me.  And sometimes it still is (I'm working on that...).  But realized that I had to swallow that, at least temporarily.  Long enough to jump off the high-dive.

Now, don't get me wrong.  You should do what you do with excellence.  Don't use what I'm saying as an excuse to do something half-baked.

When I was working on The Spark, I'd spend hours doing a bunch of vocal work, then come back the next day and not like it at all.  It was infuriating.  The only thing that stopped me from putting a hole in my computer was that, if I did that, there would be a hole in my computer. 

But slowly, something started happening. As I let people listen to the demos, they told me they liked my voice.  Not just the music.  My voice.  I almost didn't understand.  Because often, I didn't like it.  I could have cried.  It was like finding out your dog hadn't died after all.  Sometimes I almost had to stop myself from disagreeing with them, saying something like "well yeah, I really like this part too, but I need to re-record this, this, and this....." 

And I guess you could say the rest is history.  When I listen to The Spark now, I hear places that I can improve.  But that's what happens.  And I don't want to just rush on to another project.  I want more people to hear this.

I find myself writing vocal parts that I KNOW will challenge me live.  And I've listened back to live footage in recent months, sometimes disappointed at an issue like pitchiness.  But I can feel and hear myself getting better and better.  Really.  And I realize that if I hadn't put it out there to begin with, I wouldn't have had a foundation to get better from.  To challenge myself with.

I recently got to headline at the Underground, and I was listening to the footage and getting so excited.  I was impressed.  By me.  I was getting so excited in the car, so genuinely happy with what I was hearing.  Sure, there were off notes here and there, sure, my ear caught everything that needed improvement, but man, I enjoyed listening to it so much.  And one of the things that propelled me was others telling me the same thing from one performance to another. 

And I'm just going to keep getting better.  I'd love to do other professional singing in the future.  Maybe in theatre or movies.  And one day maybe I'll take some more lessons.  Become one of Brett Manning's clients, hire a vocal coach for the road or something.

When I was little, my parents never lied to me.  Not even about stuff like Santa Claus.  You should have seen me, trying to inform all these delusional kindergarteners that no jolly old elf made an annual squeeze down their home's exhaust pipe.  But the comfortable ignorance of the masses just wouldn't tolerate the strains of one lone truthbringer.  Anyway, mom always told me, "At any specific skill/task, there will always be someone better than you."  It wasn't a slam.  It wasn't even a discouragement.  She was just being honest, and would teach me to just do my best, because my worth isn't determined by a skill.  Some days, knowing that was liberating.  Other days, perhaps not so much.  But you know what?  It should be liberating.

Look, there are people who really aren't called to do things.  We've seen them.  The people that are just so convinced that they think they want to do music or acting or ANYTHING (doesn't even have to be "artistic") and you watch them and think, "Man, I'm glad they like doing this and everything, but they just ain't got it."  It can can make you cringe.  But when you know you have the gift, take what you have and use it.  Even if it doesn't seem like much.  Start with it.  You may know that people may be able to criticize it.  And YOU will almost certainly be able to criticize it, but ENJOY it too.  I personally, LOVE listening to my own music.  Not out of some deep narcissism, but because I just genuinely like it. 

Do the best with what you have.  And grow with it. 

Let me start off by saying that if you are a musician, Christian or otherwise, my goal here is not to pick on or offend you.  I love and appreciate you (and may very well like most of your music, or not), but this is what I see.  I just ask that you consider it, and then decide for yourself.  But if you're gonna read it, read it all.  I don't want you doing to me what most people do with the Bible, which is taking away part of it and not considering the entirety.

I recently happened across a blog that sought to talk candidly about the problems of Christian music, both as an art form, as an an industry in general.  What followed was a discussion of how impersonal, disingenuous, and uncreative as a whole the thing has become.  Inside, I had a struggle with this.  One part of me agreed, the other part didn't, or at least didn't want to.

Of course, the comments section blossomed (or should I say 'festered'?) into a bunch of debates as to the validity and/or cause of these woes.  The basic consensus seemed to be that popular Christian music was "disingenuous" because it was lyrically and musically a bunch of copycatting, but that it also was so unreal because it isn't practical to sing about how everything is ok all the time. 

This left me pretty frustrated.  Because I both agreed and disagreed with both of these points.  And I can make statements about it that make me feel the same way.

For instance, sometimes I feel like the Christian music industry (and I am talking everything from worship and pop to rock and metal and hip hop.  Everything.) is a great, safe bastion for listeners and families.  There are artists and networks that really are doing great things.  Other times I feel like it's just full of a bunch of people who don't read their Bibles and need to do so before they do any more damage by writing songs that come out of their own personal religion.  But, I try not to be too harsh about this, because I know everyone is in different places and isn't always going to act perfectly.  Still, sometimes I look at how the world basically ignores Christian artists,  the dying festivals, the bands scraping for cash, and I feel like the whole thing is drowning in its own blood.  Then again, I look at artists like the Newsboys or TobyMac, and they seem to be doing really well. 

So what is the real problem?  Is Christian music changing the world and doing great, or is it barely noticed and hardly surviving?  It seems like the answer to these questions can all be "yes", just depending on where you go.
But what's the cure to the problem?  Could it be that, rather than us having an artistic crisis, we need to first look at things on a spiritual level?  And why, for the love of God, have more people not asked THAT question?

Don't get me wrong.  I have a music degree from an esteemed school.  I studied music theory, composition, studio production, classical and jazz performance.  I take a hard look at popular music as well, and I am very interested in the art  of songwriting and lyricism.  I can talk to you about art and how to do it better.  I can talk to you about ways to make more artful worship music that isn't just a collection of tweetable one-liners.  But again, I think what we really need to do, as the body of Christ, is look at this spiritually FIRST. 

And so here are some of the real problems.  And solutions.

1. We've believed a lie
I was recently at an event and there was some music playing over the in-house radio.  The music was a mix of Christian and secular artists, but what really caught my attention was a particular Christian rock song that really talked about "How weak and broken" I am, or something of the sort.  I say 'something of the sort' because I've heard stuff like that  probably thousands of times.

I'm weak.  I'm sick.  I'm broken.  I'm helpless.  I'm a wreck.  It's all that I can take.  I'm breaking down.
There are secular bands whose sound I really enjoy, but when did we start taking lessons from their lyrical playbook?  I'm not saying that we should never talk about the things we've faced or are facing.  But I am saying that we need to stop making declarative statements taking ownership of infirmity and insecurity as if they were meant to be a part of us.  And this happens a TON in our rock music, but seeps into our worship and other areas as well. 

I understand this to a point.  Usually we sort of defend this by saying "Uh yeah, Sam.  We're saying that we all need Jesus.  We're a wreck without Him."  Ok.  Fine.  I get that.  But we've honestly crossed the line 90% of the time into glorifying weakness, pain, and fear.  And none of that exists in God.  And we're made in His image.

It's authentic when its real to you.  A lot of our music that DOES sound more authentic is that which is about pain and weakness.  But what that tells me is that our pain and weakness are more real to us than the victory we've been given in Christ.  And that's a problem.  I understand that we are often trying to lead people to the cross, and that means showing them that we all need Jesus.  There is validity to that.  But have we taught them ANYTHING about the life they are supposed to live AFTER the cross?  About how Jesus came to give us "Life, and life more abundantly (John 10:10)"?

A lot of people use 2 Corinthians 12 to justify this, where Paul says:
"5 Of such an one will I glory: yet of myself I will not glory, but in mine infirmities.
6 For though I would desire to glory, I shall not be a fool; for I will say the truth: but now I forbear, lest any man should think of me above that which he seeth me to be, or that he heareth of me.
7 And lest I should be exalted above measure through the abundance of the revelations, there was given to me a thorn in the flesh, the messenger of Satan to buffet me, lest I should be exalted above measure.
8 For this thing I besought the Lord thrice, that it might depart from me.
9 And he said unto me, My grace is sufficient for thee: for my strength is made perfect in weakness. Most gladly therefore will I rather glory in my infirmities, that the power of Christ may rest upon me.
10 Therefore I take pleasure in infirmities, in reproaches, in necessities, in persecutions, in distresses for Christ's sake: for when I am weak, then am I strong."

We have to understand not only the context here, but what he's talking about.  It sounds like, from this one passage out of an entire letter, Paul is saying "I'm a wreck and that gives God glory."  Not so.  Could it be that we are perhaps just reading his meaning incorrectly AND out of context?

First of all, Paul knew he wasn't chopped liver.  In Phillippians 3, Paul straight up says that if judged by things of the flesh, he'd have had room to glory.  He could have boasted, because when he was still a Pharisee, he was good at it. 

This is also the same man that said this IN 2 Corinthians 5:
"20 Now then we are ambassadors for Christ, as though God did beseech you by us: we pray you in Christ's stead, be ye reconciled to God.
21 For he hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him."

Paul talked a lot in his letters about the pain and persecution he and other Christians face.  But Paul always gave more glory to Jesus than to his situation.  In the above scripture, God tells Paul that his Grace is sufficient for his situation.  It's unfortunate that most people read this as God saying, "tough it out Paul".  That tells me that we have a TINY, EMACIATED picture of the power of God's Grace.  What if Paul is saying above that he will focus on the Glory of God despite his infirmities so that he'll be able to actually receive the power of Christ, as opposed to giving glory to his infirmities, which would actually block him from receiving the Blessing?  What if when he says "I take pleasure", he is actually taking that pleasure from God and not from the problems themselves?

It's not wrong to admit that we're wrecks without God.  But we aren't supposed to be without God.  Yet we keep writing as if we are.  And this not only gives the world a weak picture of God, we end up literally eating our words.  And that's what's happened to the industry.

Proverbs 18 says:
20 A man's belly shall be satisfied with the fruit of his mouth; and with the increase of his lips shall he be filled.
21 Death and life are in the power of the tongue: and they that love it shall eat the fruit thereof.

The scripture says that we are the Body of Christ, his representatives in the earth.  So what's up with the people who are supposed to be the picture of Christ constantly talking about how wretched and weak they are?  Because that's the picture we give the world of Jesus.

God says in Joel 3:10 "Let the weak say 'I am strong'."  Have we paid attention to that?
How about Paul's prayer in Ephesians 1:22-24, where Paul outlines that Christ has great authority in his Name, which he's given to his people, the church, who are supposed to exercise it in the earth?

Jesus told his disciples in Matthew to pray for the will of God to be done in the earth just like it is in heaven. 

Or how about  Colossians 1?
" 9 For this cause we also, since the day we heard it, do not cease to pray for you, and to desire that ye might be filled with the knowledge of his will in all wisdom and spiritual understanding;
10 That ye might walk worthy of the Lord unto all pleasing, being fruitful in every good work, and increasing in the knowledge of God;
11 Strengthened with all might, according to his glorious power, unto all patience and longsuffering with joyfulness;
12 Giving thanks unto the Father, which hath made us meet to be partakers of the inheritance of the saints in light:
13 Who hath delivered us from the power of darkness, and hath translated us into the kingdom of his dear Son:

The fact is that Paul wrote Phillippians, his most joyful letter, while he was at the bottom of one of the worst prisons in the known world.  It was literally the sewer of the palace, sloshing with feces and infested with rats.

We've believed a lie.  The lie was that we weren't artists and were unfeeling robots.  They cheapened our experience by telling us that we didn't feel deeply, and that hurt us deeply.  We forgot that some of the greatest songs of victory ever were written by people shoving it back into the face of their hardest times.  Our reaction to being called "disingenuous" was to start glorifying weakness.

We need to talk about things we deal with as humans.  Even God himself experiences sadness.  His chosen nation, Israel, was an expressive people.  They danced when they were happy, but ripped their clothes, howled, and put ashes on their heads when they were sad.  Yes.  And fear and weakness are things we all have to contend with, but they are NOT NATURAL.  Fear is the enemy of God, and we are made in the image of God.  God is love, and "perfect love casts out all fear".   Standing against fear and weakness have become part of the human experience, but they were NEVER meant to be.  They aren't innate to us.  And we are supposed to stand against them (Eph. 6:13), not just continually write odes to them out of some religious sense of piety and a bad definition of humbleness.  Because then you have a bunch of kids confessing over and over that they are so "weak, broken, and helpless" as they sing along with you. 

God didn't make a flawed creation.  He made a perfect creation that was never meant to operate apart from Him.  We've believed the lie that being "genuine" means acting like we are inherently weak and fearful beings, and we ARE NOT.  We have to be watchful about what message we are sending and how we are sending it. 

We are broken without God.  But God never created us to be apart from Him.  And we NEED to show the world what it means to be WITH him.  That doesn't mean we never talk about sadness, or say that we've never felt brokenness, but we have to STOP taking innate ownership of those things, or else, why did Jesus even come then?  He came to bear our sickness and carry our pains, and KILL them on the cross (Isaiah 53:4).  I've written sad songs.  I probably will again.  But I want to know the difference between showing dimension and openness and just promoting bad confession.  It's not always easy.  But I think that spiritually, the industry has suffered from this long enough.

2. The industry believes in doing business, but not prospering, which is corporate suicide.  And don't tell you that isn't what you see happening.
We know that as Christians we are supposed to give.  Give to God.  Give to those that are hard and easy to love.  Give to the poor.  But in order to give give give, we have to also receive.  We HAVE to believe in increase.  God wants to bless us because He loves us, and because in order to bless other people, do what we're called to do, give to the poor, and everything else, we need abundant resources.  I'm not saying that if you've experienced hard times that I am judging you.  Stuff happens, and my family has gone through that too.  But hear me out.

Abraham was our picture of God in covenant with people.  And if you even paid attention to the New Testament, you know that time and time again it talks about how Christ is the seed of Abraham, and we have been made one with Christ.

Galatians 3
26 For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus.
27 For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ.
28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
29 And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.

This doesn't mean you'll never have to do anything.  What it does mean is that there is prosperity in God's calling for your life.  And if you look at Abraham's life, he was one of the richest men of his time.  He wasn't greedy.  He didn't love money.  He loved God, and God blessed him and used that to not only show his power, to to bless others. 

There are a couple of famous scriptures that some people think debunk God's interest in us prospering.  The first is the story of the rich young ruler, in Mark 10:17-27

New American Standard Bible (NASB)

17 As He was setting out on a journey, a man ran up to Him and knelt before Him, and asked Him, “Good Teacher, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?” 18 And Jesus said to him, “Why do you call Me good? No one is good except God alone. 19 You know the commandments, ‘Do not murder, Do not commit adultery, Do not steal, Do not bear false witness, Do not defraud, Honor your father and mother.’” 20 And he said to Him, “Teacher, I have kept all these things from my youth up.” 21 Looking at him, Jesus felt a love for him and said to him, “One thing you lack: go and sell all you possess and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; and come, follow Me.” 22 But at these words a]">[a]he was saddened, and he went away grieving, for he was one who owned much property.

23 And Jesus, looking around, *said to His disciples, “How hard it will be for those who are wealthy to enter the kingdom of God!” 24 The disciples were amazed at His words. But Jesus *answered again and *said to them, “Children, how hard it is to enter the kingdom of God! 25 It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God.” 26 They were even more astonished and said to Him, “b]">[b]Then who can be saved?” 27 Looking at them, Jesus *said, “With people it is impossible, but not with God; for all things are possible with God.”

There are several things a lot of people miss here.  First of all, Jesus knew the Old Testament very well.  And he was constantly proving to people like the Pharisees that even if you think you've kept the law perfectly, you haven't.  That's why Jesus came, because people couldn't be perfect on their own.  The rich young ruler says he's kept the law perfectly, and Jesus knows good and well that even if he thinks he has, he hasn't.  But he lets that go, because he targets the area he needs to grow the most in.  This guys relies more on money than on God.

Most people stop there, and say, "See, it's hard for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God."  Ok.  But Jesus didn't say it was hard for them to exist there.  Just to enter.  Also, look at how much this freaked out the disciples.  "Who then can be saved?" they ask.  It freaks 'em out!  Why?  Because they all had money!  They were all fishermen, craftsmen, businessmen, Luke was a doctor for pete's sake!  Jesus replies, "With God all things are possible!".  So Jesus tells them that with faith in God (and subsequently in Him as messiah), anyone can. 

Another scripture that gets used a lot is:

1 Timothy 6:10New American Standard Bible (NASB)

10 For the love of money is a root of all a]">[a]sorts of evil, and some by longing for it have wandered away from the faith and pierced themselves with many griefs."

This scripture doesn't say that money is the root of the evil, but the LOVE of the money. 

So why, Sam?  Why would God want us to be prosperous.  Well, first and foremost because he loves you.  Also, because it brings glory to Him.  He made Abraham's name great knowing that Abraham would make His name great.  And, according to this scripture:

"Galatians 3:29New American Standard Bible (NASB)
29 And if you a]">[a]belong to Christ, then you are Abraham’s b]">[b]descendants, heirs according to promise."

One of the reasons Jesus came was to connect us to the Blessing that Abraham had.  We are meant to experience the same greatness that he did.  And when we prosper we are able to do MORE and BETTER things for OTHER PEOPLE.  We live in a world that tries to legislate morality and use the government as a tool to provide for people.  What we end up doing is forcing people to give.  That's not what God does.  In the book of Acts, people got together and started selling a bunch of property, taking care of each other, pooling their resources and making sure the poorer among them were taken care of.  But the difference was that they did this from a motivation of love, and did it by choice, not by obligation. 

The Bible is the story of Christ and the Blessing.  You can literally read the whole Bible and trace Christ and The Blessing from beginning to end.  Christ came to connect us to the Blessing so that we could do great things for him.  The world is literally falling apart.  But if you look at the Church in Acts, they were "self" sufficient.  The outside economy had very little bearing on them. 

The world has sequestered Christian artists to special little, untelevised, "CCM" ceremonies, while the lines are continually getting more blurry at the Grammys.  I want a Grammy.  I want stadiums.  I want to show that God is strong and able, and I want thousands of people because what He has for them is for everybody.  We literally cheat thousands of people out of the gospel when we act like stadiums are just for people who "sell their soul to the devil". 

People should want to do business with us. They shouldn't dread working with us.  We should make our payments on time, give them a little extra just to bless them, and quit being so rude at the chinese restaurant on sundays.

We'd have more stars on TV, more airtime on the radio, and frankly, better artists if we would just allow God to bless everyone (including US).  It's funny too, because people are so hypocritical about it.  We act like being a Christian means "Well, get used to small to midsize venues for the rest of your life, because it's a struggle out there, and renown is evil" but everyone flips out and gets the Christian tinglies when they find out that someone like Justin Bieber might have been raised by parents with faith.  It's like fame is all evil until someone famous says "Jesus" on the Grammys, because suddenly we might have some celebrity support.  We aren't supposed to seek fame for fame's sake.  We aren't supposed to be greedy for riches.  Those things on their own are dangerous, but again, we were meant to experience them in a close relationship with God, not in and of ourselves.  But we are supposed to prosper to bring glory to God.  What does it say to the world when God's infrastructure is failing?  Did he call you to do it, or didn't He?

Christians have gone through hard times.  I am NOT criticizing you for going through a rough financial time.  Kenneth Hagin taught that God wanted us to be blessed while he had a nickel in his pocket and barely enough gas in his tank.  He was THIS CLOSE to being dirt poor.  But he kept teaching the promises of God, and eventually saw them in His life.  Because of him, we now have Rhema Bible school in Tulsa, and scores of other outreaches around the world.  But he had to keep his faith in God's promises.

We need to do better business.  We need to quit pretending like a handshake and a smile will pay for food, gas, lodging, and bills, and using the "we're just a church" line to justify it.  Quit talking about how much it costs to buy toilet paper for your building, but then bringing in artists that you can't take care of.  And if you are in a tight spot, make sure they know that BEFORE they come to you.

This whole lack of funding spiraled downward, and will continue to do so in some circles if people don't start doing things right.  A friend of mine was telling me how he wished he could find more Christian music that he liked, but that it was hard to find because it wasn't getting played. In the areas where there isn't variety and inspiration, it's because executives HAVE to play it safe.  It's because they are TRYING to do business, but DON'T HAVE THE MONEY to take risks and promote more artists because of the problems outlined above.  There are great artists doing amazing and timeworthy things, but we have to realize that God blesses and supports people through people. 

When I was a kid, I wanted stadiums.  And I didn't see why not.  I thought that if your record sounded professional, than you must be packing out huge places.  And why not?  Carman did it.  The man packed out Texas stadium with a free Gospel concert.  The dude did rock, worship, rap, country, story songs.  I'm serious.  He was literally one of the biggest artists of the 90's (Christian, secular, or otherwise) in terms of record sales, but yet the world acts like he didn't even happen.  And that.  That shouldn't happen.

3-Talent doesn't mean you're ready
A lot of people are talented.  Walk into a guitar center.  There is probably at least one guy or girl in there that could be on the Grammys based on skill.  But do you actually know what you're talking about?  Given the opportunity, as a Christian artist, or an artist that is a Christian, or whatever, is your message worth hearing?  I feel like there are talented groups who don't know their Bible for beans, but then there are people who know the Word who really need to work on their musical professionalism. 

Do both.  That's all I'm saying.